The opinion can be found here: Ninth Circuit Memorandum
A weekly discussion of issues and current trends in immigration law and specifically deportation cases. (510) 863-8058
Showing posts with label BIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BIA. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Ninth Circuit Issues Favorable Decision in Petition for Review for Najarro-Portal
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued their memorandum on December 7, 2015, finding that the Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals had erred in failing to grant Mr. Najarro-Portal deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel and Unusual Treatment in Case number 13-73958.
Wednesday, September 16, 2015
Oral Arguments at the Ninth Circuit Yesterday
I had oral arguments at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday in an immigration appeal. Narrajo-Portal v. Lynch, Case No. 13-73985. The argument was streamed live over the Internet.
The issue was whether the Immigration Judge properly denied Mr. Portal the protection under the Convention Against Torture based primarily on his adverse credibility determination. The Board of Immigration Appeals initially remanded the case back to the IJ for further consideration after finding that he had committed "clear error" in his initial determination.
The video is here:
The issue was whether the Immigration Judge properly denied Mr. Portal the protection under the Convention Against Torture based primarily on his adverse credibility determination. The Board of Immigration Appeals initially remanded the case back to the IJ for further consideration after finding that he had committed "clear error" in his initial determination.
The video is here:
Friday, June 1, 2012
Board of Immigration Appeals Remanded One of Our Adam Walsh Cases Back to USCIS For Further Proceedings
Last month, our office received the decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals in an Adam Walsh Case. We argued to the Board that USCIS improperly imposed the "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Standard" in determining whether the petition poses a risk to the intended beneficiary. My contention was that this standard had no underlying basis as Congress never intended to require this criminal law threshold. In most immigration matters the standard is more probable than not.
In the decision, the Board specifically asked USCIS to explain 8 items in how they reached their conclusion to deny our client's I-130 visa petition. It is my belief that this is a milestone in adjudication of these petitions because the entire process has not be thoroughly thought through and the Board is asking USCIS to do so.
Labels:
Adam Walsh Act,
BIA,
Board of Immigration Appeals,
I-130,
visa petition
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)